Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1290518
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove unneeded "0x" when %pa formatting is used. |
| Date | 2015-12-13 02:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qF3up-1x9-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qyri9-3QA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyOHM-2Bf-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qADoS-8nQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Dmitry Krivenok
<krivenok.dmitry@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> if (size > max_size) {
>>> dev_err(pcie->dev,
>>> - "res size 0x%pap exceeds max supported size 0x%llx\n",
>>> + "res size %pap exceeds max supported size 0x%llx\n",
>>
>> %pa also works.
>>
>
> Yes, but AFAIK %pap and %pa are identical (see address_val() in lib/vsprintf.c),
> so I'm not sure I understand your comment.
>
> Did you mean that %pa should be used instead of %pap?
> I see that %pa is used much more often than %pap, but I didn't find any
> evidence that %pap is deprecated.
+Rasmus.
No, it's not, but it explicitly for phys_addr_t (it might be nice to
to have %par, for example for explicitly shown that is for
resource_size_t, Rasmus?).
For my opinion for resources better to use %pa for now, though %pap
will work as well.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/1] Remove unneeded "0x" when %pa formatting is used. Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2015-12-13 02:20 +0100
csiph-web