Re: [PATCH 0/2] security: clarify that some code is really non-modular

From	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 0/2] security: clarify that some code is really non-modular
Date	2015-12-10 16:10 +0100
Message-ID	<qEb10-7RF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<qDVyW-5YD-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903

Show all headers | View raw

Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote:

> Paul Gortmaker (2):
>   security/keys: make big_key.c explicitly non-modular
>   security/integrity: make ima/ima_mok.c explicitly non-modular

Note that I only see patch 1.  Note also that keyrings@linux-nfs.org should
now be keyrings@vger.kernel.org.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0/2] security: clarify that some code is really non-modular Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-09 23:40 +0100
  [PATCH 2/2] security/integrity: make ima/ima_mok.c explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-09 23:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] security/integrity: make ima/ima_mok.c explicitly  non-modular Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-12-10 16:50 +0100
  [PATCH 1/2] security/keys: make big_key.c explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> - 2015-12-09 23:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 0/2] security: clarify that some code is really non-modular David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2015-12-10 16:10 +0100

csiph-web