Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1290173

Re: README Cleanup Project

Show all headers | View raw

Why does the Linux kernel keep outdated cruft like this in tree?

If you need lilo you can just run /sbin/lilo yourself, there is no
need for this to be in the kernel, especially when the project is
being phased out already.

Should I send a patch removing all lilo entries from the project?

Diego

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 02:46:30AM -0200, Diego Viola wrote:
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to do some cleanup on the README, for example, I see it
>>>> still mentions LILO in a few places, e.g.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/README#L256-L258
>>>>
>>>> And:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/README#L295-L317
>>>>
>>>> Is this still relevant today? Can I send a patch to remove it from the
>>>> README? Any objections?
>>>
>>> What for?  LILO still works just fine here, TYVM.
>>>
>>
>> I know LILO still works fine, and I know the project is still alive.
>
> Wait, I'm actually not sure about my statement above, looks like the
> project is dead:
>
> "NOTE: I will finish development of LILO at December 2015 because of
> some limitations (e.g. with BTFS, GPT, RAID). If someone want to
> develop this nice software further, please let me know ..."
>
> http://lilo.alioth.debian.org/
>
>>
>>>> Could you guys also help me identify other parts in the README that
>>>> are not relevant anymore today?
>>>>
>>>> I understand some people still use LILO but most don't anymore, so I
>>>> would like to help keep the README updated to reflect on what the
>>>> current standards and needs are.
>>>
>>> _What_ current standards?
>>
>> Perhaps not "standards" but there are other bootloaders these days,
>> GRUB and systemd-boot being one of them.
>>
>> Shouldn't the README be generic or neutral about bootloaders?
>>
>> See this message from Jonathan Corbet where he gave his opinion on this:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/10/602
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Diego
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

README Cleanup Project Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 05:50 +0100
  Re: README Cleanup Project Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-12-12 06:40 +0100
    Re: README Cleanup Project Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 07:10 +0100
      Re: README Cleanup Project Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 07:30 +0100
        Re: README Cleanup Project Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 13:00 +0100
          Re: README Cleanup Project Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 13:50 +0100
            Re: README Cleanup Project Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> - 2015-12-12 15:10 +0100

csiph-web