Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1289774
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64: add sysfs cpu_capacity attribute |
| Date | 2015-12-11 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qEA93-7FL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qy0hX-2Wb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qy0rE-30z-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEaeB-7jl-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEbNp-8az-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <qEdPd-1ez-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 06:01:59PM +0000, Juri Lelli wrote: > On 10/12/15 15:59, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 02:15:04PM +0000, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: > > > On 23/11/15 14:28, Juri Lelli wrote: > > > > The new attribute shows up as: > > > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpu_capacity > > > This sysfs interface is not really needed for arm or arm64. People can > > > build the dt blob if they want to change the values. Less code to carry > > > ... Let's focus on the core functionality, which is parsing cpu capacity > > > from dt file to task scheduler for heterogeneous systems. > > That does make the tuning process much more cumbersome - users have to > > rebuild and reboot to tweak the numbers rather than just tweaking the > > numbers and rerunning the benchmark (which seems like something people > > would want to automate). > IMHO, this is not a tuning interface. It is an alternative interface, > w.r.t. DTs, that we could use to provide default capacity values to the > kernel. I'm proposing both here as they make both sense to me. Then we > might dedice for which one to go (or if we need some other way) or to > keep both for flexibility. Kind of repeating what I said in the other mail but I'd say that any interface which provides a mechanism for setting a magic number that influences system performance is providing tuning. It's hard to see how else to describe it to be honest.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64: add sysfs cpu_capacity attribute Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> - 2015-12-10 15:20 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64: add sysfs cpu_capacity attribute Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-10 17:00 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64: add sysfs cpu_capacity attribute Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2015-12-10 19:10 +0100
Re: [RFC PATCH 8/8] arm64: add sysfs cpu_capacity attribute Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-12-11 19:00 +0100
csiph-web