Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1286837
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware |
| Date | 2015-12-08 21:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qDxdf-75c-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qC1Iu-5b5-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDdex-2Of-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDpz3-2iu-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDrrc-3vd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:25:57PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote: >> On Mon, 07 Dec, at 11:10:43PM, Kosuke Tatsukawa wrote: >> > >> > Thank you pointing that out. >> > >> > linux-4.4-rc3 booted without a problem on a real server even with XD >> > turned off by the firmware. I didn't notice this before because I was > > The aforementioned patch reenables NX. > >> Borislav, what do you think about stripping PAGE_NX from 'page_flags' >> in kernel_map_pages_in_pgd() if NX isn't supported, rather than >> returning EINVAL? At least that way EFI runtime services would still >> work. > > I guess we can - I mean, I don't see what can go wrong more when > allowing the kernel to execute even NX UEFI regions. Maybe easier > generation of "gadgets" in the ROP sense ... > > On a related node, I'm very sceptical of the existence of this "noexec" > chicken bit, if you ask me. It is a really bad idea, security-wise, to > disable NX. Is there even a valid use case to disable NX? > > Because if not, I'd vote for removing that chicken bit or at least > taining the kernel with > > add_taint(TAINT_USER_MORON, ... ); If we add this for not-nx, I would like to add it for not-rodata too. > Kees, has this NX disabling practice come up in the past, per chance... ? I've never seen anyone actually use it. I was asked to include it out of fear of some kind of rogue imagined CPU configuration that mixed NX and non-NX capable CPUs in a single machine where the forced NX re-enablement code would cause problems. As you might imagine, I'm not aware of this case ever being an issue. ;) -Kees -- Kees Cook Chrome OS & Brillo Security -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@ab.jp.nec.com> - 2015-12-04 01:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2015-12-04 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware Kosuke Tatsukawa <tatsu@ab.jp.nec.com> - 2015-12-08 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> - 2015-12-08 13:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-08 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2015-12-08 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-08 22:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2015-12-08 21:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix kernel panic when booting with XD disabled in uEFI firmware Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-12-08 22:00 +0100
csiph-web