Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1286388

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements

Show all headers | View raw

Hi David,

2015-12-04 21:15 GMT+01:00 Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>:
> (no top posting please)
>
> On 02/12/15 00:26, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> Can you please describe in more details, what would you expect from
>> such special abstraction layer regarding buffer managers? I'd like to
>> understand more of your expectations and evaluate possible work.
>
> Well, something along these lines:
>
> - have the ability to register a particular pool (location + number of
> buffers) in a way that is relatively device agnostic (initialization
> would of course be device specific)
>
> - provide a set of buffer management APIs like those you proposed below,
> and have some generic code that leverages what
> drivers/net/ethernet/sun/niu.c does for instance
>
> - introduce a netdev_alloc_skb_from_pool() or something like that which
> would limit the amount of code to change in your network driver to
> benefit from that feature so based
>
> I am sure David would be able to suggest more detailed API.
>

As we're getting closer to what a generic BM part, could you please
share your thoughts on the possible API?


>>>
>>>> What kind of abstraction and helpers do you mean? Some kind of API
>>>> (e.g. bm_alloc_buffer, bm_initialize_ring bm_put_buffer,
>>>> bm_get_buffer), which would be used by platform drivers (and specific
>>>> aplications if one wants to develop on top of the kernel)?
>>>>
>>>> In general, what is your top-view of such solution and its cooperation
>>>> with the drivers?
>>>
>>> The tricky parts involved have to do with allocating pages for the
>>> buffer pools and minimizing the number of atomic refcounting
>>> operations on those pages for for the puts and gets, particularly
>>> around buffer replenish runs.
>>>
>>> For example, if you're allocating a page for a buffer pool the device
>>> will chop into N (for any N < PAGE_SIZE) byte pieces, you can
>>> eliminate many atomic operations.
>

Do you think you can point to anything similar that could be a sort of
reference for such solution?

Best regards,
Marcin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements David Miller <davem@redhat.com> - 2015-11-30 17:30 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2015-12-02 09:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-04 21:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> - 2015-12-08 12:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 00/13] mvneta Buffer Management and enhancements David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-12-08 18:00 +0100

csiph-web