Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1286140
| From | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] timekeeping: Cap adjustments so they don't exceede the maxadj value |
| Date | 2015-12-08 02:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qDf6G-40S-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qC6Ia-7o-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <qD5gZ-5PF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 01:57:54PM -0800, John Stultz wrote: >> Thus its been occasionally noted that users have seen >> confusing warnings like: >> >> Adjusting tsc more than 11% (5941981 vs 7759439) > > Thanks for looking into this, John. > >> Thus this patch adds some extra logic to enforce the max adjustment >> cap in the internal steering. >> >> Note: This has the potential to slow corrections when the ADJ_TICK >> value is furthest away from the default value. So it would be good to >> get some testing from folks using Chrony, to make sure we don't >> cause any troubles there. > > I ran few tests with chronyd, forcing it to make the largest possible > adjustment of the tick and it seems to work fine. > > However, I'm still able to trigger the warning by feeding a large > offset to the NTP PLL using a short time constant. When the multiplier > is already at the maximum and it wants to move it even further, there > should be no timekeeping_apply_adjustment() call as it always adjusts > the multiplier at least by one. Ack. Thanks for noticing this. I could reproduce it and have a fix. Will send an update out later. thanks -john -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC][PATCH] timekeeping: Cap adjustments so they don't exceede the maxadj value John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-04 23:10 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] timekeeping: Cap adjustments so they don't exceede the maxadj value Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> - 2015-12-07 15:50 +0100
Re: [RFC][PATCH] timekeeping: Cap adjustments so they don't exceede the maxadj value John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2015-12-08 02:20 +0100
csiph-web