Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1287514

Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c?

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c?
Date 2015-12-09 15:10 +0100
Message-ID <qDNBo-Xy-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qDEop-3mU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDHYZ-5KQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDJo6-6xK-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDNBo-Xy-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:02:44AM -0500, Joe Mario wrote:
> Yes, that would be a great enhancement,

This is hardly new though; I've outlined the very same the first time
the c2c thing got mentioned.

> but is it any reason to hold up the current implementation?

I just wonder how much of c2c is still useful once we get it done
proper. And once such a tool is out there, its hard to kill, leaving us
with a maintenance burden we could do without.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> - 2015-12-09 05:20 +0100
  Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-12-09 09:10 +0100
    Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-12-09 09:20 +0100
      Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-12-09 10:20 +0100
    Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-09 10:40 +0100
      Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-09 12:00 +0100
      Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com> - 2015-12-09 12:10 +0100
      Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-09 15:10 +0100
      Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-12-09 18:00 +0100
        Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2015-12-09 18:20 +0100
          Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-12-09 18:30 +0100
            Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2015-12-09 20:50 +0100
          Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com> - 2015-12-09 21:50 +0100
            Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> - 2015-12-10 03:40 +0100

csiph-web