Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1287514
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? |
| Date | 2015-12-09 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qDNBo-Xy-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qDEop-3mU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDHYZ-5KQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDJo6-6xK-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDNBo-Xy-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:02:44AM -0500, Joe Mario wrote: > Yes, that would be a great enhancement, This is hardly new though; I've outlined the very same the first time the c2c thing got mentioned. > but is it any reason to hold up the current implementation? I just wonder how much of c2c is still useful once we get it done proper. And once such a tool is out there, its hard to kill, leaving us with a maintenance burden we could do without. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> - 2015-12-09 05:20 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-12-09 09:10 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-12-09 09:20 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-12-09 10:20 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-09 10:40 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-09 12:00 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com> - 2015-12-09 12:10 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-09 15:10 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-12-09 18:00 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2015-12-09 18:20 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2015-12-09 18:30 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com> - 2015-12-09 20:50 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com> - 2015-12-09 21:50 +0100
Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> - 2015-12-10 03:40 +0100
csiph-web