Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1287128

Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on the slow path

From Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on the slow path
Date 2015-12-09 06:50 +0100
Message-ID <qDFNw-4bT-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qDbZ7-1Mo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDbZ9-1Mo-37@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDERs-3xo-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
>> 64-bit syscalls currently have an optimization in which they are
>> called with partial pt_regs.  A small handful require full pt_regs.
>>
>> In the 32-bit and compat cases, I cleaned this up by forcing full
>> pt_regs for all syscalls.  The performance hit doesn't really matter.
>>
>> I want to clean up the 64-bit case as well, but I don't want to hurt
>> fast path performance.  To do that, I want to force the syscalls
>> that use pt_regs onto the slow path.  This will enable us to make
>> slow path syscalls be real ABI-compliant C functions.
>>
>> Use the new syscall entry qualification machinery for this.
>> stub_clone is now stub_clone/ptregs.
>>
>> The next patch will eliminate the stubs, and we'll just have
>> sys_clone/ptregs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>
> Fails to boot, bisected to this patch:
> [   32.675319] kernel BUG at kernel/auditsc.c:1504!
> [   32.675325] invalid opcode: 0000 [#65] SMP
> [   32.675328] Modules linked in:
> [   32.675333] CPU: 1 PID: 216 Comm: systemd-cgroups Tainted: G      D
>         4.3.0-rc4+ #7
> [   32.675336] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> [   32.675339] task: ffff880000075340 ti: ffff880036520000 task.ti:
> ffff880036520000
> [   32.675350] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8113d9ed>]  [<ffffffff8113d9ed>]
> __audit_syscall_entry+0xcd/0xf0
> [   32.675353] RSP: 0018:ffff880036523ef0  EFLAGS: 00010202
> [   32.675355] RAX: 000000000000000c RBX: ffff8800797b3000 RCX: 00007ffef8504e88
> [   32.675357] RDX: 000056172f37cfd0 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 000000000000000c
> [   32.675359] RBP: ffff880036523f00 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff880000075340
> [   32.675361] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000
> [   32.675363] R13: 00000000c000003e R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000001000
> [   32.675380] FS:  00007f02b4ff48c0(0000) GS:ffff88007fc80000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [   32.675383] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> [   32.675385] CR2: 00007f93d47ea0e0 CR3: 0000000036aa9000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> [   32.675391] Stack:
> [   32.675396]  ffff880036523f58 0000000000000000 ffff880036523f10
> ffffffff8100321b
> [   32.675401]  ffff880036523f48 ffffffff81003ad0 000056172f374040
> 00007f93d45c9990
> [   32.675404]  0000000000000001 0000000000000001 0000000000001000
> 000000000000000a
> [   32.675405] Call Trace:
> [   32.675414]  [<ffffffff8100321b>] do_audit_syscall_entry+0x4b/0x70
> [   32.675420]  [<ffffffff81003ad0>] syscall_trace_enter_phase2+0x110/0x1d0
> [   32.675425]  [<ffffffff81761d94>] tracesys+0x3a/0x96
> [   32.675464] Code: 00 00 00 00 e8 a5 e0 fc ff c7 43 04 01 00 00 00
> 48 89 43 18 48 89 53 20 44 89 63 0c c7 83 94 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 5b
> 41 5c 5d c3 <0f> 0b 48 c7 43 50 00 00 00 00 48 c7 c2 60 b4 c5 81 48 89
> de 4c
> [   32.675469] RIP  [<ffffffff8113d9ed>] __audit_syscall_entry+0xcd/0xf0
> [   32.675471]  RSP <ffff880036523ef0>

I'm not reproducing this, even with audit manually enabled.  Can you
send a .config?

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on the slow path Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-12-07 23:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 02:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-08 02:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 14:10 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-12-08 20:00 +0100
          Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-08 23:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-08 02:00 +0100
  Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 05:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-09 06:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-09 07:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/entry/64: Always run ptregs-using syscalls on  the slow path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 14:00 +0100
        [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 14:10 +0100
          Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-09 20:00 +0100
            Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-09 22:10 +0100
              Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-09 22:20 +0100
                Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-10 01:00 +0100
                Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2015-12-10 06:50 +0100
                Re: [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2015-12-10 07:00 +0100
          [PATCH] x86/entry/64: Remove duplicate syscall table for fast path Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2015-12-09 20:40 +0100

csiph-web