Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation

From	Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation
Date	2015-12-09 03:50 +0100
Message-ID	<qDCZj-2fi-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <qCf8K-5AQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDCwj-25G-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDCFY-295-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDCPD-2c5-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qDCPD-2c5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/09/15 at 10:38am, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 03:36:32AM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
> > 
> > Without knowing your exact implementation plans: introducing an
> > additional reference indirection for every lookup will have a
> > huge performance penalty as well.
> > 
> > Is your plan to only introduce the master table after an
> > allocation has failed?
> 
> Right, obviously the extra indirections would only come into play
> after a failed allocation.  As soon as we can run the worker thread
> it'll try to remove the extra indirections by doing vmalloc.

OK, this sounds like a good compromise. The penalty is isolated
for the duration of the atomic burst.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Thread

rhashtable: ENOMEM errors when hit with a flood of insertions Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-12-03 14:00 +0100
  RE: rhashtable: ENOMEM errors when hit with a flood of insertions David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM> - 2015-12-03 16:20 +0100
  Re: rhashtable: ENOMEM errors when hit with a flood of insertions Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 17:10 +0100
    Re: rhashtable: ENOMEM errors when hit with a flood of insertions Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-12-04 01:10 +0100
    rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-12-04 15:50 +0100
      Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2015-12-04 18:50 +0100
        Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> - 2015-12-04 19:20 +0100
          Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-12-05 08:10 +0100
            Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> - 2015-12-07 16:40 +0100
              Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-12-07 20:40 +0100
                Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> - 2015-12-09 03:20 +0100
                Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-12-09 03:30 +0100
                Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-12-09 03:40 +0100
                Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> - 2015-12-09 03:50 +0100
                Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> - 2015-12-09 03:40 +0100
      Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-12-04 23:00 +0100
        Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2015-12-05 08:10 +0100
          Re: rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2015-12-06 04:50 +0100

csiph-web