Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1282908
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 |
| Date | 2015-12-03 11:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qBzsS-3Jm-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qBn8m-4el-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBvfA-19g-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBzjb-3FV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03-12-15, 11:26, Ben Gamari wrote: > Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> writes: > > But, before I start reviewing this series, I have few comments. > > - We weren't able to use cpufreq-dt driver for big LITTLE platforms > > earlier, as it never had multi cluster support and we wanted > > clock-sharing information via DT. > > Fair enough. > > > - That is all fixed now. > > I did not see any mention of this in the cpufreq-dt driver binding > documentation, otherwise I would have tried going this route. > > Do you have any references? I'd be happy to examine what would be > necessary to go this route although, being an independent contributor, > it may take time. You wouldn't find in cpufreq-dt documentation as its not specific to that. I have seen you DT patches now, and you have created the OPP tables mostly correctly. Just create the cpufreq-platform device for cpufreq-dt instead of arm-big-little one. And it should just work. > > - I want Samsung's big LITTLE platforms to use cpufreq-dt and drop > > arm_big_little driver completely. > > That sounds like a great direction going forward. However, I would still > kindly request that you consider this series. > > The existence of future plans of course does not change the fact that > users have real hardware today; hardware that they have spent money on > and would like to use. Cpufreq support has already been deferred once > for similar reasons of interface churn which essentially forestalled > working functionality from entering the kernel by eight months; I'd > really like to avoid having this happen again. I am not talking about any future plans here that need some work to be done. Its all working today, you just need to use a different driver. > Sounds reasonable to me. However, I'd just like to reiterate that this > line of work can be pursued independently from the upstreaming of this > series. I think this is the right time to upstream the right solution. Just try it once, if you face lots of difficulties or issues, then we can ofcourse see.. NOTE: Check how OPP nodes are required to be created now in linux-next. They should be named like opp@<freq-hz>. Something I noticed in your DTs. -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org> - 2015-12-02 22:40 +0100
[PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: arm-big-little: clarify frequency units Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org> - 2015-12-02 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: arm-big-little: clarify frequency units "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org> - 2015-12-03 15:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH 11/12] cpufreq: arm-big-little: clarify frequency units Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org> - 2015-12-03 15:40 +0100
[PATCH 07/12] ARM: dts: Exynos5422: fix OPP tables Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org> - 2015-12-02 22:40 +0100
[PATCH 01/12] cpufreq: arm_big_little: add cluster regulator support Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org> - 2015-12-02 22:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 01/12] cpufreq: arm_big_little: add cluster regulator support Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 05:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-12-03 07:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org> - 2015-12-03 11:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-12-03 11:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-12-03 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org> - 2015-12-03 12:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Ben Gamari <ben@smart-cactus.org> - 2015-12-07 22:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-12-03 12:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 0/12] cpufreq: Add support for Exynos 5800, 5420, and 5422 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-12-03 12:30 +0100
csiph-web