Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1282321

Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree binding

From Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree binding
Date 2015-12-02 21:10 +0100
Message-ID <qBlSW-3wb-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <qygZs-5z4-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyqP7-3pF-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <qysee-4rc-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBkWS-2Tg-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBlzA-38R-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 07:41:07PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
> >> +	nand0: nandcs@0 {
> >> +		compatible = "brcm,nandcs";
> >> +		reg = <0>;
> >> +		nand-on-flash-bbt;
> >> +		nand-ecc-strength = <1>;
> >> +		nand-ecc-step-size = <512>;
> >> +
> >> +		#address-cells = <0>;
> >> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> > 
> > What are these {address,size}-cells for? If you need them for
> > partitioning, then those are wrong -- they shouldn't be zero. Maybe just
> > drop them? (I can cut them out when applying, if that's the only change
> > to make.)
> 
> This is the correct way to do partitioning, there would be a
> "partitions" block with no address/size that contains the partitions as
> child nodes. [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt]

That doc says nothing about {address,size}-cells = 0. When using the new
binding with a 'partitions' subnode, I'm not sure the address
translation specification really matters anyway; the flash space is a
new address space unrelated to the parents, and we don't do any
translation from the 'flash' node to the 'partitions' node. So you don't
need #{address,size}-cells in the flash node, but you do in the
'partitions' node.

> I think they're also implicit so you can just remove those two lines.

From ePAPR: "The #address-cells and #size-cells properties are not
inherited from ancestors in the device tree. They shall be explicitly
defined."

But we don't want to define them. I'd drop them, at least from the
example, as they're not relevant.

> I've created a bcm963268part driver so there won't need to be any
> partitions in DT for bcm63268.

Just curious, do you plan to submit this driver? We're working on
matching up partition parsers to flash devices via device tree
of_match_table's, so you could do something like this:

	nand0: nandcs@0 {
		compatible = "brcm,nandcs";
		...

		partitions {
			compatible = "brcm,bcm963268-partitions";
			...
		};
	};

FYI.

> >> +	};
> >> +};

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 20:10 +0100
  Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 20:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 21:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Florian Fainelli <fainelli@broadcom.com> - 2015-12-02 22:50 +0100
  Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Jonas Gorski <jogo@openwrt.org> - 2015-12-02 20:40 +0100
  Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 20:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 21:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 21:20 +0100
        Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 21:30 +0100
        Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 21:30 +0100
          Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu> - 2015-12-02 21:40 +0100
            Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device  tree binding Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2015-12-02 21:50 +0100

csiph-web