Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1283040
| From | Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: Document Program-Order guarantees |
| Date | 2015-12-03 14:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qBBXH-5yd-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <qBBuF-53y-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qBBuF-53y-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 01:40:14PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: [snip] > + * > + * CPU0 (schedule) CPU1 (try_to_wake_up) CPU2 (schedule) > + * > + * LOCK rq(0)->lock LOCK X->pi_lock > + * dequeue X > + * sched-out X > + * smp_store_release(X->on_cpu, 0); > + * > + * smp_cond_acquire(!X->on_cpu); > + * X->state = WAKING > + * set_task_cpu(X,2) > + * > + * LOCK rq(2)->lock > + * enqueue X > + * X->state = RUNNING > + * UNLOCK rq(2)->lock > + * > + * LOCK rq(2)->lock // orders against CPU1 > + * sched-out Z > + * sched-in X > + * UNLOCK rq(1)->lock ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ This is a typo, right? Should be "UNLOCK rq(2)->lock". Regards, Boqun > + * > + * UNLOCK X->pi_lock > + * UNLOCK rq(0)->lock > + * > + *
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4/4] sched: Document Program-Order guarantees Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-03 13:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: Document Program-Order guarantees Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2015-12-03 14:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched: Document Program-Order guarantees Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-12-03 14:30 +0100
csiph-web