Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1226364
| From | Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 16/26] x86, pkeys: dump PKRU with other kernel registers |
| Date | 2015-09-16 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q9pjA-3D9-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q9p0e-309-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
I'm a bit ambivalent about whether this is needed or not. Protection Keys never affect kernel mappings. But, they can affect whether the kernel will fault when it touches a user mapping. But, the kernel doesn't touch user mappings without some careful choreography and these accesses don't generally result in oopses. Should we dump out PKRU like this in our oopses? --- b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c~pkeys-30-kernel-error-dumps arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c~pkeys-30-kernel-error-dumps 2015-09-16 10:48:18.424290612 -0700 +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c 2015-09-16 10:48:18.427290748 -0700 @@ -116,6 +116,8 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, i printk(KERN_DEFAULT "DR0: %016lx DR1: %016lx DR2: %016lx\n", d0, d1, d2); printk(KERN_DEFAULT "DR3: %016lx DR6: %016lx DR7: %016lx\n", d3, d6, d7); + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE)) + printk(KERN_DEFAULT "PKRU: %08x\n", read_pkru()); } void release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task) _ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 16/26] x86, pkeys: dump PKRU with other kernel registers Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2015-09-16 20:10 +0200
csiph-web