Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1227156

Re: [PATCH] block: blk-merge: fast-clone bio when splitting rw bios

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/17/2015 09:50 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>> On 09/17/2015 09:13 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
>>>
>>> biovecs has become immutable since v3.13, so it isn't necessary
>>> to allocate biovecs for the new cloned bios, then we can save
>>> one extra biovecs allocation/copy, and the allocation is often
>>> not fixed-length and a bit more expensive.
>>>
>>> For example, if the 'max_sectors_kb' of null blk's queue is set
>>> as 16(32 sectors) via sysfs just for making more splits, this patch
>>> can increase throught about ~70% in the sequential read test over
>>> null_blk(direct io, bs: 1M).
>>
>>
>> I'd be curious how this compares to before we did the splitting, not
>> exceeding the limits through bio_add_page() instead?
>
> Let me show these test results:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> kernel                                                    | throught
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4.3.0-rc1-next-20150916                   | bw=12227MB/s, iops=12227
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 4.3.0-rc1-next-20150916 with patch | bw=21011MB/s, iops=21011
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> v4.2                                                       |
> bw=18959MB/s, iops=18958
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> So from the above, looks this patch is kind of fix for performance regression
> introduced by 54efd50bfd(block: make generic_make_request handle
> arbitrarily sized bios), :-)

So that's 1MB user IO, and 16KB device limit, correct? If that is the 
case, then the results make sense. And looks like we're still ahead of 
the older bio_add_page() approach, which is what I mostly cared about. 
Thanks! I'll apply this for -rc2.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH] block: blk-merge: fast-clone bio when splitting rw bios Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-09-17 17:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] block: blk-merge: fast-clone bio when splitting rw bios Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-09-17 18:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] block: blk-merge: fast-clone bio when splitting rw bios Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2015-09-17 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] block: blk-merge: fast-clone bio when splitting rw bios Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2015-09-17 18:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] block: blk-merge: fast-clone bio when splitting rw bios Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> - 2015-09-17 18:00 +0200

csiph-web