Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] clocksource: simplify ACPI code in arm_arch_timer.c

From	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] clocksource: simplify ACPI code in arm_arch_timer.c
Date	2015-09-14 20:10 +0200
Message-ID	<q8Gmu-5nU-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <q24ae-3Zi-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <q24tA-4lT-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q25zk-5SC-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <q25IZ-64h-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q25SG-6fM-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	ARM Ltd

Show all headers | View raw

On 27/08/15 14:51, Fu Wei wrote:
> Hi Thomas, Hanjun
> 
> On 27 August 2015 at 21:40, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/7/29/236
>>>>
>>>> If that is ok with you, we will introduce similar DECLARE_ thing
>>>> for clock declare.
>>
>> Yes.
> 
> Thanks
> 
>>
>>> Or we can drop this patch from this patch set, and clean up this
>>> patch when the ACPI_DECLARE() infrastructure is ready for upstream.
>>
>> Works either way. I just noticed that hard coded init thing and
>> decided to rant about it :)
> 
> OK, good idea, this patch will be improve by DECLARE_ thing, then upstream.
> drop this from this patchset.
> 
> Great thanks for your help

You probably want to keep an eye on this:

https://lwn.net/Articles/657238/

which implements the necessary infrastructure. I'd appreciate if you
could give it a go to find out if it works for you.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v7 8/8] clocksource: simplify ACPI code in arm_arch_timer.c Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-09-14 20:10 +0200

csiph-web