Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1224403

Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in native code

From Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in native code
Date 2015-09-14 20:50 +0200
Message-ID <q8GZb-688-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q7BoS-1rn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7BoS-1rn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7EZs-6Iu-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8AK6-5JN-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/14/2015 08:06 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:27:44PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Waiman Long wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static inline bool virt_queued_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>>> 	if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
>>> 		return false;
>>>
>>> -	while (atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0)
>>> +	while (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->val, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) != 0)
>>> 		cpu_relax();
>> This code has changed with Peter's recent ccas fix. And the whole virt_queued_spin_lock()
>> thing will now be under pv configs. So this doesn't apply to native code anymore, so it
>> looks like it should be dropped altogether.
> Yeah, it also doesn't make sense, this ix x86 arch code, x86 cannot do
> cmpxchg_acquire. Then again, I suppose we could argue its of
> documentation value..

Yes, it is to be consistent with the change in asm_generic qspinlock.h. 
We can certainly skip that.

Cheers,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in native code Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-11 20:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in  native code Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2015-09-12 00:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops in  native code Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-14 14:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops  in native code Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-14 20:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] locking/qspinlock: relaxes cmpxchg & xchg ops  in native code Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-14 17:20 +0200

csiph-web