Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1224184

Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt

From Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt
Date 2015-09-14 16:10 +0200
Message-ID <q8CCe-8ro-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q7BoS-1rn-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7BoS-1rn-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 02:37:37PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> This patch allows one attempt for the lock waiter to steal the lock
> when entering the PV slowpath.  This helps to reduce the performance
> penalty caused by lock waiter preemption while not having much of
> the downsides of a real unfair lock.

> @@ -415,8 +458,12 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
>  
>  	for (;; waitcnt++) {
>  		for (loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; loop--) {
> -			if (!READ_ONCE(l->locked))
> -				return;
> +			/*
> +			 * Try to acquire the lock when it is free.
> +			 */
> +			if (!READ_ONCE(l->locked) &&
> +			   (cmpxchg(&l->locked, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) == 0))
> +				goto gotlock;
>  			cpu_relax();
>  		}
>  

This isn't _once_, this is once per 'wakeup'. And note that interrupts
unrelated to the kick can equally wake the vCPU up.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-11 20:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-14 16:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-14 21:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-14 16:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-14 21:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-14 21:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-15 10:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-15 17:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-16 17:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-17 17:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-14 16:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6 5/6] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com> - 2015-09-14 21:20 +0200

csiph-web