Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1224115
| From | Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node in list lru |
| Date | 2015-09-14 15:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q8BG9-75S-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q6vYf-40J-53@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6vYf-40J-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8xVV-1GG-35@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8Ah4-4WS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q8AK6-5JN-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | IBM |
On 09/14/2015 05:34 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 05:09:31PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> On 09/14/2015 02:30 PM, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:01:46AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>>> The functions used in the patch are in slowpath, which gets called
>>>> whenever alloc_super is called during mounts.
>>>>
>>>> Though this should not make difference for the architectures with
>>>> sequential numa node ids, for the powerpc which can potentially have
>>>> sparse node ids (for e.g., 4 node system having numa ids, 0,1,16,17
>>>> is common), this patch saves some unnecessary allocations for
>>>> non existing numa nodes.
>>>>
>>>> Even without that saving, perhaps patch makes code more readable.
>>>
>>> Do I understand correctly that node 0 must always be in
>>> node_possible_map? I ask, because we currently test
>>> lru->node[0].memcg_lrus to determine if the list is memcg aware.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, node 0 is always there. So it should not be a problem.
>
> I think it should be mentioned in the comment to list_lru_memcg_aware
> then.
>
Something like this: ?
static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru)
{
/*
* This needs node 0 to be always present, even
* in the systems supporting sparse numa ids.
*/
return !!lru->node[0].memcg_lrus;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node in list lru Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-08 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node in list lru Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> - 2015-09-14 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node in list lru Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-14 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node in list lru Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> - 2015-09-14 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node in list lru Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-14 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Replace nr_node_ids for loop with for_each_node in list lru Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> - 2015-09-14 15:30 +0200
csiph-web