Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1222318
| From | Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands |
| Date | 2015-09-10 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q7dFU-7WH-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q6Pay-6Er-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6PWW-7yW-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6QJk-ho-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6Uae-5ii-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q75oZ-4nU-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
...
>> - you have some implicit padding after the structure and should replace that
>> with explictit pad bytes to extend the structure to a multiple of its
>> alignment (8 bytes).
>
> Would padding with __u32 at the end be sufficient here? I assume the
> __u32 would be 32-bit aligned. However, was not sure if this would
> always be the case.
Is there something wrong with implicit padding?
Only one copy of the structure is passed to the kernel for any given call.
>>>> struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd {
>>>> __u64 num_of_cmds;
>>>> struct mmc_ioc_cmd cmds[0];
>>>> };
I think this would work just as well. But doesn't "pointer to an
array" require 32-bit ioctl compat handling?
We were trying to avoid a 32-bit user space compatibility handler.
>>>> as I said, both are ugly. My first choice would have been the other one,
>>>> but I'm sure you have some reasons yourself.
Why do you prefer the alternative you proposed?
My guess is better type checking (and I would like that too). But
maybe there is something else?
cheers,
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-09-09 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-09 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-09-09 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-09 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-09-10 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-10 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com> - 2015-09-10 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-09-10 20:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com> - 2015-09-10 22:30 +0200
csiph-web