Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1222318

Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands

From Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands
Date 2015-09-10 19:20 +0200
Message-ID <q7dFU-7WH-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q6Pay-6Er-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6PWW-7yW-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6QJk-ho-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6Uae-5ii-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q75oZ-4nU-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
...
>> - you have some implicit padding after the structure and should replace that
>>   with explictit pad bytes to extend the structure to a multiple of its
>>   alignment (8 bytes).
>
> Would padding with __u32 at the end be sufficient here? I assume the
> __u32 would be 32-bit aligned. However, was not sure if this would
> always be the case.

Is there something wrong with implicit padding?
Only one copy of the structure is passed to the kernel for any given call.

>>>> struct mmc_ioc_multi_cmd {
>>>>     __u64 num_of_cmds;
>>>>     struct mmc_ioc_cmd cmds[0];
>>>> };

I think this would work just as well. But doesn't "pointer to an
array" require 32-bit ioctl compat handling?
We were trying to avoid a 32-bit user space compatibility handler.

>>>> as I said, both are ugly. My first choice would have been the other one,
>>>> but I'm sure you have some reasons yourself.

Why do you prefer the alternative you proposed?

My guess is better type checking (and I would like that too). But
maybe there is something else?

cheers,
grant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-09-09 17:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-09 18:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-09-09 18:50 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-09 22:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-09-10 10:30 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-09-10 10:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com> - 2015-09-10 19:20 +0200
            Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> - 2015-09-10 20:30 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] mmc: block: Add new ioctl to send multi commands Grant Grundler <grundler@google.com> - 2015-09-10 22:30 +0200

csiph-web