Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1223349

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Fix u16 overflows

From Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Fix u16 overflows
Date 2015-09-12 10:20 +0200
Message-ID <q7Ocq-3hf-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q7cTw-6MC-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7cTw-6MC-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> Vince reported that its possible to overflow the various size fields
> and get weird stuff if you stick too many events in a group.
> 
> Put a lid on this by requiring the fixed record size not exceed 16k.
> This is still a fair amount of events (silly amount really) and leaves
> plenty room for callchains and stack dwarves while also avoiding
> overflowing the u16 variables.

Does this leave a natural ABI extension route here, in case in the future it 
becomes a problem? We should take aside a value to mean 'larger record' or such?

Could we list exactly which fields this concerns, in which structures?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Fix u16 overflows Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-10 18:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Fix u16 overflows Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-09-12 10:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Fix u16 overflows Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-14 11:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] perf: Fix u16 overflows Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-09-14 11:40 +0200

csiph-web