Re: [Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is surprised by offline CPUs

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is surprised by offline CPUs
Date	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 20:00:02 +0200
Message-ID	<q7AMa-sV-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<q7jrX-82W-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7sbU-4SS-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q7zZN-7Wu-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alien8.de; s=alien8; t=1441994112; bh=3pZZ5q24/JDTRn1vjwgUhL33DmfGezbYPKPvSspTiuM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=rS58Gq1d3V/j+zHQ3m09+GSalx0ytBOhJKxtoP GaCvsV1aMcLidWSYiFTkDdOvn9AU03ZoARZfTSQxHWkkOrYUc9XokHDZoFDqPwx14fb AngxURSdemRC+72oPjvkSMWqkvVEwWRGSXBbtJoX+oV91F8h0ZLxm48CrF9HyvjYPs=
Dkim-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alien8.de; s=alien8; t=1441994111; bh=3pZZ5q24/JDTRn1vjwgUhL33DmfGezbYPKPvSspTiuM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=AtmIr+x1rarYwBU+JA/C23bgE58FzwA1waFbtW idb3JllWlx1csC/c4pPlrzY/nspabfj57zbMi+l7C5Hckd2tVmS72qYjZVI9GN+34KC 6Au6pjzjwsn53xCsOfgvv4WIde4tDmmvCHnjy+Ok9vqt4AUC/N+EMycaSdxxigOpho=
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition	inline
User-Agent	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID	<linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	21
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
X-Original-Date	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:55:08 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<20150911175508.GF2042@pd.tnic>
X-Original-References	<1441931198-3209-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com> <20150911084636.GB2042@pd.tnic> <20150911180302.GA4233@otc-brkl-03.jf.intel.com>
X-Original-Sender	linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref	csiph.com linux.kernel:1223009

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 02:03:03PM -0400, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> I think using gen_pool should be fine. Also seems the notify moved to
> the mce_gen_pool_process(), so there should be no notifier calls from
> the offline cpu.
>
> Let me take a respin and resend. I should have noticed.. apologies.

No worries. :)

This is to prove Tony wrong who thinks that nothing happens in MCA land. :-P

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is surprised by offline CPUs Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> - 2015-09-11 01:30 +0200
  Re: [Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is  surprised by offline CPUs Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-09-11 10:50 +0200
    Re: [Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is  surprised by offline CPUs "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com> - 2015-09-11 19:10 +0200
      Re: [Patch V1] x86, mce: CPU synchronization for broadcast MCE's is  surprised by offline CPUs Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2015-09-11 20:00 +0200

csiph-web