Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1222048

Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure

From Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure
Date 2015-09-10 11:10 +0200
Message-ID <q761I-5mS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q52EW-8lv-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6r8e-5u9-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/08/2015 09:19 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Sorry for the late response for quite a while...
>
> On 09/05/2015 01:06 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> IRQ controllers and timers are the two types of device the kernel
>> requires before being able to use the device driver model.
>>
>> ACPI so far lacks a proper probing infrastructure similar to the one
>> we have with DT, where we're able to declare IRQ chips and
>> clocksources inside the driver code, and let the core code pick it up
>> and call us back on a match. This leads to all kind of really ugly
>> hacks all over the arm64 code and even in the ACPI layer.
>>
>> It turns out that providing such a probing infrastructure is rather
>> easy, and provides a much deserved cleanup in both the arch code, the
>> GIC driver, and the architected timer driver.
>>
>> I'm sure there is some more code to be deleted, and one can only
>> wonder why this wasn't done before the arm64 code was initially merged
>> (the diffstat says it all...).
>>
>> Patches are against v4.2, and a branch is available at
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git
>> acpi/device-probing

I pulled, and noticed that there is v2, it's cleaner than v1 for the
patch 1/5 to me :)

>
> Great thanks to cleanup these stuff, I will test
> this patch set and review it, will get back to you
> if I get anything.

I tested the v2 and it boots pretty happy as before, if
you post to maillist,

Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>

Thanks
Hanjun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 15:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2015-09-10 11:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/5] ACPI probing infrastructure Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-09-11 16:10 +0200

csiph-web