Re: [git pull] drm for 4.3

From	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [git pull] drm for 4.3
Date	2015-09-08 20:30 +0200
Message-ID	<q6vOy-3Pp-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<q57XZ-7hG-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6gw9-7aV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6hsd-9i-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6ioi-1tz-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6jaG-2po-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i.e. 59 commits in a 5000 commit tree is likely not that bad, 59
> commits in a 20 commit tree would be bad.

I think it's about size of the commits. If it's 59 clean oneliner
fixes, I don't think it's a big deal. If it's 59 patches that add new
functionality, that's a different issue. The size of the base tree is
almost entirely irrelevant in that situation. Fixes are ok, new
features are not.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [git pull] drm for 4.3 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-09-08 04:10 +0200
  Re: [git pull] drm for 4.3 Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 05:10 +0200
    Re: [git pull] drm for 4.3 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-09-08 06:10 +0200
      Re: [git pull] drm for 4.3 Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 07:00 +0200
        Re: [git pull] drm for 4.3 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-09-08 20:30 +0200

csiph-web