Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1220525
| From | Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() |
| Date | 2015-09-08 09:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6l2O-55D-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q61dM-1OC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6gFQ-7sI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 9/8/15 10:10 AM, Byungchul Park wrote: > hello wanpeng, > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 05:45:20PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> The sleeper task will be normalized when moved from fair_sched_class, in >> order that vruntime will be adjusted either the task is running or sleeping >> when moved back. The nomalization in switch_to_fair for sleep task will >> result in lose fair sleeper bonus in place_entity() once the vruntime - >> cfs_rq->min_vruntime is big when moved from fair_sched_class. > it is nothing to do with normalization. > > if vruntime - cfs_rq->min_vruntime is big even though place_entity() was > called when moved from fair class, then we actually expect that it still has > a big vruntime when moved back to fair class. > > if we don't expect that it still has a big vruntime when moved back to fair > class, we need to consider other approaches e.g. to move a position calling > place_entity() or to add place_entity() call properly .. > > however we should not touch normalization logic. in other words, if we > normalized the vruntime when leaved, then we should necessarily restore the > vruntime to a non-normalized value when moved back. Not about vruntime - cfs_rq->min_vruntime is big, I think my patch description above is confusing, and what's wrong I found is explained in the mail which reply to Peterz. > >> This patch fix it by adjusting vruntime just during migrating as original >> codes since the vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized in >> this case. > could you explain this in detail? when is a vruntime not normalized? > The comments in task_move_group_fair() which you removed in your commit: | * When !queued, vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized Regards, Wanpeng Li -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-07 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-07 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 08:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 10:40 +0200
RE: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() "byungchul.park" <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 10:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() "byungchul.park" <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-08 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-09-08 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2015-09-08 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: fix lose fair sleeper bonus in switch_to_fair() Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> - 2015-09-08 09:00 +0200
csiph-web