Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1220445
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH V3 2/9] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field |
| Date | 2015-09-08 03:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6gcN-6wG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q6eum-42W-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Conservative governor has its own 'enable' field to check if
conservative governor is used for a CPU or not
This can be checked by policy->governor with 'cpufreq_gov_conservative'
and so this field can be dropped.
Because its not guaranteed that dbs_info->cdbs.shared will a valid
pointer for all CPUs (will be NULL for CPUs that don't use
ondemand/conservative governors), we can't use it anymore. Lets get
policy with cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
Updates: use cpufreq_cpu_get_raw() instead of cpufreq_cpu_get().
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 ++-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 12 +-----------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 82428099c569..2a0c2a26df11 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -239,12 +239,13 @@ int cpufreq_generic_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_generic_init);
/* Only for cpufreq core internal use */
-static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
+struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
return policy && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) ? policy : NULL;
}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cpu_get_raw);
unsigned int cpufreq_generic_get(unsigned int cpu)
{
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index 84a1506950a7..1fa1deb6e91f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -23,6 +23,19 @@
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s, cs_cpu_dbs_info);
+static int cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
+ unsigned int event);
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
+static
+#endif
+struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_conservative = {
+ .name = "conservative",
+ .governor = cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs,
+ .max_transition_latency = TRANSITION_LATENCY_LIMIT,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners,
struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
@@ -119,12 +132,14 @@ static int dbs_cpufreq_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
struct cpufreq_freqs *freq = data;
struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info =
&per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, freq->cpu);
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(freq->cpu);
- if (!dbs_info->enable)
+ if (!policy)
return 0;
- policy = dbs_info->cdbs.shared->policy;
+ /* policy isn't governed by conservative governor */
+ if (policy->governor != &cpufreq_gov_conservative)
+ return 0;
/*
* we only care if our internally tracked freq moves outside the 'valid'
@@ -367,16 +382,6 @@ static int cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
return cpufreq_governor_dbs(policy, &cs_dbs_cdata, event);
}
-#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
-static
-#endif
-struct cpufreq_governor cpufreq_gov_conservative = {
- .name = "conservative",
- .governor = cs_cpufreq_governor_dbs,
- .max_transition_latency = TRANSITION_LATENCY_LIMIT,
- .owner = THIS_MODULE,
-};
-
static int __init cpufreq_gov_dbs_init(void)
{
return cpufreq_register_governor(&cpufreq_gov_conservative);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
index 939197ffa4ac..750626d8fb03 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -463,7 +463,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
cs_dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
- cs_dbs_info->enable = 1;
cs_dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur;
} else {
struct od_ops *od_ops = cdata->gov_ops;
@@ -482,9 +481,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_start(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct dbs_data *dbs_data)
{
- struct common_dbs_data *cdata = dbs_data->cdata;
- unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(cpu);
+ struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = dbs_data->cdata->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
struct cpu_common_dbs_info *shared = cdbs->shared;
/* State should be equivalent to START */
@@ -493,13 +490,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
gov_cancel_work(dbs_data, policy);
- if (cdata->governor == GOV_CONSERVATIVE) {
- struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *cs_dbs_info =
- cdata->get_cpu_dbs_info_s(cpu);
-
- cs_dbs_info->enable = 0;
- }
-
shared->policy = NULL;
mutex_destroy(&shared->timer_mutex);
return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
index 50f171796632..2ed3c07fea5e 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -170,7 +170,6 @@ struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s {
struct cpu_dbs_info cdbs;
unsigned int down_skip;
unsigned int requested_freq;
- unsigned int enable:1;
};
/* Per policy Governors sysfs tunables */
@@ -270,6 +269,7 @@ static ssize_t show_sampling_rate_min_gov_pol \
extern struct mutex cpufreq_governor_lock;
+struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu);
void dbs_check_cpu(struct dbs_data *dbs_data, int cpu);
int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
struct common_dbs_data *cdata, unsigned int event);
--
2.4.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V2 2/9] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-08 02:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH V2 2/9] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 03:40 +0200 [PATCH V3 2/9] cpufreq: conservative: remove 'enable' field Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 03:50 +0200
csiph-web