Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1220421
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree |
| Date | 2015-09-08 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6eaZ-3Gb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pR6fo-DL-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pRDbj-66K-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Linus, On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 19:12:56 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 04:00:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > -359 i386 userfaultfd sys_userfaultfd > > ++374 i386 userfaultfd sys_userfaultfd > > Do I understand correctly the syscall number of userfaultfd for x86 > 32bit has just changed from 359 to 374? Appreciated that you CCed me > on such a relevant change to be sure I didn't miss it. > > Then the below is needed as well. The below patch was missed when the userfaultfd stuff and the x86 changes were merged. I have repeated the patch in the clear below. From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 18:53:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] userfaultfd: selftest: update userfaultfd x86 32bit syscall number It changed as result of linux-next merge of other syscalls. Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c index 0c0b839..76071b1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ #ifdef __x86_64__ #define __NR_userfaultfd 323 #elif defined(__i386__) -#define __NR_userfaultfd 359 +#define __NR_userfaultfd 374 #elif defined(__powewrpc__) #define __NR_userfaultfd 364 #else -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-09-08 01:40 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-09-08 20:20 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2015-09-09 01:00 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-09-09 01:10 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-09-09 01:30 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2015-09-16 09:00 +0200
csiph-web