[PATCH] fix ufs write vs. readpage race when writing into a hole

From	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	[PATCH] fix ufs write vs. readpage race when writing into a hole
Date	2015-09-09 11:20 +0200
Message-ID	<q6JHP-7aW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<q5ylr-2HZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

	Followup to UFS series - with the way we clear the new blocks (via
buffer cache, possibly on more than a page worth of file) we really should
not insert a reference to new block into inode block tree until after we'd
cleared it.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/ufs/balloc.c b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
index fb8b54e..dc5fae6 100644
--- a/fs/ufs/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ufs/balloc.c
@@ -417,14 +417,14 @@ u64 ufs_new_fragments(struct inode *inode, void *p, u64 fragment,
 	if (oldcount == 0) {
 		result = ufs_alloc_fragments (inode, cgno, goal, count, err);
 		if (result) {
+			ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount,
+					newcount - oldcount, locked_page != NULL);
 			write_seqlock(&UFS_I(inode)->meta_lock);
 			ufs_cpu_to_data_ptr(sb, p, result);
 			write_sequnlock(&UFS_I(inode)->meta_lock);
 			*err = 0;
 			UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag =
 				max(UFS_I(inode)->i_lastfrag, fragment + count);
-			ufs_clear_frags(inode, result + oldcount,
-					newcount - oldcount, locked_page != NULL);
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&UFS_SB(sb)->s_lock);
 		UFSD("EXIT, result %llu\n", (unsigned long long)result);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH] fix ufs write vs. readpage race when writing into a hole Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2015-09-09 11:20 +0200

csiph-web