Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1221155
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] cpufreq: governor: Drop __gov_queue_work() |
| Date | 2015-09-09 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q6BAB-3Go-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pQPHz-1DB-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6fgK-5ca-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q6gw9-7aV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tuesday, September 08, 2015 07:30:44 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 08-09-15, 03:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, July 27, 2015 05:58:09 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > > __gov_queue_work() isn't required anymore and can be merged with > > > gov_queue_work(). Do it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> > > > > Quite frankly I don't see the point. > > But isn't that just an unnecessary wrapper ? It isn't a wrapper, just a separation of code executed in each step of the loop. There's nothing wrong with having a separate function for that in principle. I wouldn't make a fuss about that if that was new code even, so I don't see why we should change it. > > I'd even remove the inline from its definition and let the compiler decide > > what to do with it. > > What if the compiler decides to link it? Why add a function call for > (almost) no use? If the compiler does that, let it do it. :-) If you think that you can outsmart the compiler people by doing such optimizations at this level manually, you're likely wrong. Serious man-hours go into making that stuff work as well as it can in compilers. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] cpufreq: governor: Drop __gov_queue_work() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-08 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] cpufreq: governor: Drop __gov_queue_work() Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 04:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2 4/9] cpufreq: governor: Drop __gov_queue_work() "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-09-09 02:40 +0200
csiph-web