Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1219921

Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI

From Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI
Date 2015-09-07 06:20 +0200
Message-ID <q5W4p-304-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <pumCC-4uc-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pumCC-4uc-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <puqmT-1Dy-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <puqPW-2rM-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <puESR-6kW-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Hanjun,

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Liviu,
>
> On 2015年05月27日 01:20, Jiang Liu wrote:
>>
>> On 2015/5/27 0:58, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:49:14PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ARM64 ACPI based PCI host bridge init needs a arch dependent
>>>> struct pci_controller to accommodate common PCI host bridge
>>>> code which is introduced later, or it will lead to compile
>>>> errors on ARM64.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Hanjun,
>>>
>>> Two questions: why don't you introduce this patch next to the
>>> one that is going to make use of it (or even merge it there)?
>
>
> this is because of this patch is needed by Jiang Liu's patch set
> to fix the compile error on ARM64, I'd rather do that, but It's
> better to let Jiang Liu's patch goes in, and then this one, that's
> why I prepared a single patch for the struct. (I mentioned it
> in the cover letter)
>
>>> Second, why is the whole struct pci_controller not surrounded
>>> by #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI as you are implying that this is needed
>>> only for ACPI?
>
>
> I hope it can be reused, since the NUMA node and segment (domain)
> is both needed for DT and ACPI, if it's not the case foe now, I
> can surrounded them all by #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI.
we can make use of this structure to hold pci to numa node
mapping(pcibus_to_node).
can you please pull node member out of  CONFIG_ACPI ifdef.
or you can put only acpi_device under ifdef.
>
>>>
>>> Btw, looking through the whole series I'm not (yet) convinced
>>> that this is needed at all.
>>
>> Hi Liviu,
>>         This structure is required by the requested patch set
>> at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/472249/, which consolidates
>> the common code to support PCI host bridge into ACPI core.
>
>
> Jiang, thanks for the explanation :)
>
> Thanks
> Hanjun

thanks
Ganapat
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for  ACPI Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-09-07 10:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for  ACPI Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 15:40 +0200

csiph-web