Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1219921
| From | Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI |
| Date | 2015-09-07 06:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q5W4p-304-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pumCC-4uc-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pumCC-4uc-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <puqmT-1Dy-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <puqPW-2rM-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <puESR-6kW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Hanjun, On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Liviu, > > On 2015年05月27日 01:20, Jiang Liu wrote: >> >> On 2015/5/27 0:58, Liviu Dudau wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 01:49:14PM +0100, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>>> >>>> ARM64 ACPI based PCI host bridge init needs a arch dependent >>>> struct pci_controller to accommodate common PCI host bridge >>>> code which is introduced later, or it will lead to compile >>>> errors on ARM64. >>> >>> >>> Hi Hanjun, >>> >>> Two questions: why don't you introduce this patch next to the >>> one that is going to make use of it (or even merge it there)? > > > this is because of this patch is needed by Jiang Liu's patch set > to fix the compile error on ARM64, I'd rather do that, but It's > better to let Jiang Liu's patch goes in, and then this one, that's > why I prepared a single patch for the struct. (I mentioned it > in the cover letter) > >>> Second, why is the whole struct pci_controller not surrounded >>> by #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI as you are implying that this is needed >>> only for ACPI? > > > I hope it can be reused, since the NUMA node and segment (domain) > is both needed for DT and ACPI, if it's not the case foe now, I > can surrounded them all by #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI. we can make use of this structure to hold pci to numa node mapping(pcibus_to_node). can you please pull node member out of CONFIG_ACPI ifdef. or you can put only acpi_device under ifdef. > >>> >>> Btw, looking through the whole series I'm not (yet) convinced >>> that this is needed at all. >> >> Hi Liviu, >> This structure is required by the requested patch set >> at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/472249/, which consolidates >> the common code to support PCI host bridge into ACPI core. > > > Jiang, thanks for the explanation :) > > Thanks > Hanjun thanks Ganapat > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@gmail.com> - 2015-09-07 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-09-07 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM64 / PCI: introduce struct pci_controller for ACPI Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> - 2015-09-08 15:40 +0200
csiph-web