Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1218110

Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000

From Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000
Date 2015-09-03 11:10 +0200
Message-ID <q4yGS-7v1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q4xKN-69T-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4y4a-6wl-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4ydP-6Hz-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:34:32AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 17:28 +0900 schrieb Yongtaek Lee:
> > As i know "vmalloc=size" is not mandatory so that i think default value of
> > vmalloc_min is wrong. 
> > 
> So, if we go and apply your logic to a 1GB system we should resize the
> vmalloc area to 0 bytes in order to avoid RAM truncation without
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM?
> 
> Sorry, but the only sane options here are to either live with the
> truncation, enable CONFIG_HIGHMEM, or set vmalloc size manually.
> Changing a default value that affects everyone for the benefit of your
> specific use-case isn't a sane option.

Exactly right.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than 0xf0000000 Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com> - 2015-09-03 04:30 +0200
  [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com> - 2015-09-03 07:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than  0xf0000000 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-09-03 10:10 +0200
    Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than  0xf0000000 Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com> - 2015-09-03 10:30 +0200
      Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than  0xf0000000 Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> - 2015-09-03 10:40 +0200
        Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than  0xf0000000 Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com> - 2015-09-03 10:50 +0200
          Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than  0xf0000000 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-09-03 11:20 +0200
            [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB Yongtaek Lee <ytk.lee@samsung.com> - 2015-09-03 12:40 +0200
              Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which lowmem size is limited to 760MB Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2015-09-04 03:30 +0200
        Re: Re: [PATCH] ARM: fix bug which VMALLOC_START is lowwer than  0xf0000000 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> - 2015-09-03 11:10 +0200

csiph-web