Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1217568
| From | Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] gpio: Propagate errors from chip->get() |
| Date | 2015-09-02 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q4fuz-58W-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q2Aa5-7XR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <q3M9c-5l3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> wrote:
> On Fri 28 Aug 09:44 PDT 2015, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>
>> It's possible to have gpio chips hanging off unreliable remote buses
>> where the get() operation will fail to acquire a readout of the current
>> gpio state. Propagate these errors to the consumer so that they can
>> act on, retry or ignore these failing reads, instead of treating them as
>> the line being held high.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> index 3b5e516298e0..dc17dbf8c234 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>> @@ -1173,15 +1173,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_is_active_low);
>> * that the GPIO was actually requested.
>> */
>>
>> -static bool _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
>> +static int _gpiod_get_raw_value(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
>> {
>> struct gpio_chip *chip;
>> - bool value;
>> int offset;
>> + int value;
>>
>> chip = desc->chip;
>> offset = gpio_chip_hwgpio(desc);
>> - value = chip->get ? chip->get(chip, offset) : false;
>> + value = chip->get ? chip->get(chip, offset) : -EIO;
>
> Linus, Alexandre, please feel free to apply this with -ENOTSUPP in
> accordance to Alexandre's comment in [1], if you prefer that. I picked
> -EIO as that's what's used in most other places when the get() op is
> missing.
>
> Maybe we should follow up with separate patch to make that consistent?
I will let Linus decide which value is the more appropriate, the patch
looks solid to me!
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] gpio: Propagate errors from chip->get() Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> - 2015-08-29 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] gpio: Propagate errors from chip->get() Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> - 2015-09-01 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] gpio: Propagate errors from chip->get() Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com> - 2015-09-02 14:40 +0200
csiph-web