Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1217574
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel |
| Date | 2015-09-02 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q4fEd-5kp-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q49fr-4zG-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4abx-5U4-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4abx-5U4-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4eRQ-4a6-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4f1w-4AK-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:05:54PM +0800, pi3orama wrote: SNIP > >>> perf_evlist__splice_list_tail(evlist, &data.list, entries); > >>> evlist->nr_groups += data.nr_groups; > >>> - last = perf_evlist__last(evlist); > >>> - last->cmdline_group_boundary = true; > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> @@ -1252,7 +1262,13 @@ foreach_evsel_in_last_glob(struct perf_evlist *evlist, > >>> struct perf_evsel *last = NULL; > >>> int err; > >>> - if (evlist->nr_entries > 0) > >>> + /* > >>> + * Don't return when list_empty, give func a chance to report > >>> + * error when it found last == NULL. > >>> + * > >>> + * So no need to WARN here, let *func do this. > >>> + */ > >>> + if (!list_empty(&evlist->entries)) > > > > why is it better than to check evlist->nr_entries? > > evlist->nr_entries is equivalent to !list_empty(&evlist->entries) in here, right? > > > > By checking list we won't rely on the assumption that nr_entries reflects the > actual number of elements in that list, makes the logic of this code more compact. > Don't you think so? > > At this point they are equivalent, but the whole patch is preventive action. ok, fair enough ;-) Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> thanks, jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 02/31] perf tools: Don't set cmdline_group_boundary if no evsel is collected Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-29 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/31] perf tools: Don't set cmdline_group_boundary if no evsel is collected Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2015-08-31 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/31] perf tools: Don't set cmdline_group_boundary if no evsel is collected Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-01 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/31] perf tools: Don't set cmdline_group_boundary if no evsel is collected "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-09-01 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 02/31] perf tools: Don't set cmdline_group_boundary if no evsel is collected "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-09-01 13:00 +0200
[PATCH] perf tools: Don't set leader if parser doesn't collect an evsel Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-09-02 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't set leader if parser doesn't collect an evsel "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-09-02 05:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't set leader if parser doesn't collect an evsel 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> - 2015-09-02 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't set leader if parser doesn't collect an evsel "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-09-02 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-09-02 09:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> - 2015-09-02 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-02 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com> - 2015-09-02 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2015-09-02 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2015-09-02 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com> - 2015-09-02 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> - 2015-09-02 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Don't write to evsel if parser doesn't collect evsel pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com> - 2015-09-03 00:30 +0200
csiph-web