Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1218803
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [[PATCH v6 02/10] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces |
| Date | 2015-09-04 12:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q4W6u-7nE-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q4Py2-6nf-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q4PHI-6yv-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 20:07 -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Currently, the PMU interface allows reading only one counter at a time.
> But some PMUs like the 24x7 counters in Power, support reading several
> counters at once. To leveage this functionality, extend the transaction
> interface to support a "transaction type".
>
> The first type, PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD, refers to the existing transactions,
> i.e. used to _schedule_ all the events on the PMU as a group. A second
> transaction type, PERF_PMU_TXN_READ, will be used in a follow-on patch,
> by the 24x7 counters to read several counters at once.
>
> Extend the transaction interfaces to the PMU to accept a 'txn_flags'
> parameter and use this parameter to ignore any transactions that are
> not of type PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD.
>
> Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for his input.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
These powerpc changes look OK to me.
So for those you can have an:
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Having said that, we do end up repeating a lot of boiler plate for each arch,
which is a pity. eg:
> +static void power_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu, unsigned int txn_flags)
> {
> struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
>
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuhw->txn_flags); /* txn already in flight */
> +
> + cpuhw->txn_flags = txn_flags;
> + if (txn_flags & ~PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD)
> + return;
> +
And so on.
But I can't think of an easy way to avoid that, so it's not a blocker, but
maybe someone can think of a nice solution to avoid it?
cheers
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 0/10] perf: Implement group-read of events using txn interface Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
[[PATCH v6 06/10] perf: Invert perf_read_group() loops Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
[[PATCH v6 10/10] perf: Drop PERF_EVENT_TXN Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
[[PATCH v6 07/10] perf: Add return value for perf_event_read(). Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
[[PATCH v6 09/10] powerpc/perf/hv-24x7: Use PMU_TXN_READ interface Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
[[PATCH v6 03/10] perf: Split perf_event_read() and perf_event_count() Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
[[PATCH v6 01/10] sparc/perf: Remove unnecessary assignment Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
[[PATCH v6 08/10] Define PERF_PMU_TXN_READ interface Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
[[PATCH v6 02/10] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-09-04 05:20 +0200
Re: [[PATCH v6 02/10] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2015-09-04 12:10 +0200
csiph-web