Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1216030
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit |
| Date | 2015-08-31 08:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q3qs1-7CJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q36jE-3I2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> +static __always_inline int __constant_test_bit(long nr, const unsigned long *addr)
> +{
> + return ((1UL << (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1))) &
> + (addr[nr >> _BITOPS_LONG_SHIFT])) != 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int __variable_test_bit(long nr, const unsigned long *addr)
> +{
> + int oldbit;
> +
> + asm volatile("bt %2,%1\n\t"
> + "sbb %0,%0"
> + : "=r" (oldbit)
> + : "m" (*addr), "Ir" (nr));
> +
> + return oldbit;
> +}
Color me confused, why use assembly for this at all?
Why not just use C for testing the bit (i.e. turn __constant_test_bit() into
__test_bit()) - that would also allow the compiler to propagate the result,
potentially more optimally than we can do it via SBB...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-08-30 10:40 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] kvm/x86: use __test_bit "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-08-30 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-08-31 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2015-08-31 08:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-08-31 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-08-31 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-08-31 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-08-31 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-09-01 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-09-01 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-09-01 13:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-09-01 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2015-09-02 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/bitops: implement __test_bit "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2015-08-31 10:00 +0200
csiph-web