Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1215412

Re: CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE and memory hot plug code on x86_64

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com> wrote:
>>Can you post whole log with SRAT related info?
>
> I can probably reproduce again and get full logs when I get run time on the system again, but here’s some output that we saved in our internal Jira case :
>
> [    0.000000] NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=6
> [    0.000000] NUMA: Node 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x0009ffff] + [mem 0x00100000-0xd7ffffff] -> [mem 0x00000000-0xd7ffffff]
> [    0.000000] NUMA: Node 0 [mem 0x00000000-0xd7ffffff] + [mem 0x100000000-0x427ffffff] -> [mem 0x00000000-0x427ffffff]
> [    0.000000] NODE_DATA(0) allocated [mem 0x407fe3000-0x407ffffff]
> [    0.000000] NODE_DATA(1) allocated [mem 0x807fe3000-0x807ffffff]
> [    0.000000] NODE_DATA(2) allocated [mem 0xc07fe3000-0xc07ffffff]
> [    0.000000] NODE_DATA(3) allocated [mem 0x1007fe3000-0x1007ffffff]
> [    0.000000] NODE_DATA(4) allocated [mem 0x1407fe3000-0x1407ffffff]
> [    0.000000] NODE_DATA(5) allocated [mem 0x1807fdd000-0x1807ff9fff]
> [    0.000000]  [ffffea0000000000-ffffea00101fffff] PMD -> [ffff8803f8600000-ffff880407dfffff] on node 0
> [    0.000000]  [ffffea0010a00000-ffffea00201fffff] PMD -> [ffff8807f8600000-ffff880807dfffff] on node 1
> [    0.000000]  [ffffea0020a00000-ffffea00301fffff] PMD -> [ffff880bf8600000-ffff880c07dfffff] on node 2
> [    0.000000]  [ffffea0030a00000-ffffea00401fffff] PMD -> [ffff880ff8600000-ffff881007dfffff] on node 3
> [    0.000000]  [ffffea0040a00000-ffffea00501fffff] PMD -> [ffff8813f8600000-ffff881407dfffff] on node 4
> [    0.000000]  [ffffea0050a00000-ffffea00601fffff] PMD -> [ffff8817f7e00000-ffff8818075fffff] on node 5
>
> If I remember correctly there was a mix of 4GB and 8GB DIMMs populated on this system. In addition the firmware reserved 512MByte at the end of each memory controllers physical range (hence the reserved ranges in the e820 map).
>
> Note: this was with 4.1.0 vanilla so it could be obsolete now with 4.2-rc. I have not yet tested with your latest patches that you and Tony discussed.

We still need to see your srat table layout.

like the one from Tony's setup.

[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0xfffffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x1000000000-0x1d6fffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x1d70000000-0x2c17ffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x2c18000000-0x3abfffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 2 PXM 2 [mem 0x3ac0000000-0x4967ffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 2 PXM 2 [mem 0x4968000000-0x580fffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 3 PXM 3 [mem 0x5810000000-0x66b7ffffff]
[    0.000000] SRAT: Node 3 PXM 3 [mem 0x66b8000000-0x755fffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: Initialized distance table, cnt=4
[    0.000000] NUMA: Node 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff] + [mem
0x100000000-0xfffffffff] -> [mem 0x00000000-0xfffffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: Node 0 [mem 0x00000000-0xfffffffff] + [mem
0x1000000000-0x1d6fffffff] -> [mem 0x00000000-0x1d6fffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: Node 1 [mem 0x1d70000000-0x2c17ffffff] + [mem
0x2c18000000-0x3abfffffff] -> [mem 0x1d70000000-0x3abfffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: Node 2 [mem 0x3ac0000000-0x4967ffffff] + [mem
0x4968000000-0x580fffffff] -> [mem 0x3ac0000000-0x580fffffff]
[    0.000000] NUMA: Node 3 [mem 0x5810000000-0x66b7ffffff] + [mem
0x66b8000000-0x755fffffff] -> [mem 0x5810000000-0x755fffffff]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE and memory hot plug code on x86_64 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> - 2015-08-28 07:30 +0200
  Re: CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE and memory hot plug code on x86_64 Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com> - 2015-08-28 09:20 +0200
    Re: CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE and memory hot plug code on x86_64 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> - 2015-08-28 18:00 +0200

csiph-web