Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties

From	Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties
Date	2015-08-27 21:40 +0200
Message-ID	<q2bbI-5yj-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pYU7o-6dl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYXRD-41k-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pYYum-4Zm-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZ52O-68k-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> wrote:
> great, just take into account the deep vs. shallow suspend modes :-)

One note: do you think it would make sense to re-implement shallow
suspend as "standby"?  I had a proof of concept doing that in
<https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/#/c/275123/>.  One nice
advantage is that you "magically" get a second set of regulator states
for standby vs "mem".

If I understand correctly, the distinction between "standby" and "mem"
is not too clearly defined, so if we wanted to use it for this it
wouldn't be terrible?

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> - 2015-08-27 21:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> - 2015-08-27 23:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2015-08-27 23:00 +0200

csiph-web