Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1215650

Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event

From "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event
Date 2015-08-29 04:20 +0200
Message-ID <q2DUl-4XT-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <q2lXr-4sW-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2lXs-4sW-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2Cvf-2JO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2D7Y-3I2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q2DhD-3Tb-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 2015/8/29 9:34, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 8/28/15 6:19 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote:
>> For me, I use bpf_output_trace_data() to output information like PMU 
>> count
>> value. Perf is the only receiver, so global collector is perfect. 
>> Could you
>> please describe your usecase in more detail?
>
> there is a special receiver in user space that only wants the data from
> the bpf program that it loaded. It shouldn't conflict with any other
> processes. Like when it's running, I still should be able to use perf
> for other performance analysis. There is no way to share single
> bpf:bpf_output_data event, since these user processes are completely
> independent.
>
I'd like to see whether it is possible to create dynamic tracepoints so
different receivers can listen on different tracepoints. For my side, maybe
I can encode format information into the new tracepoints so don't need
those LLVM patches.

For example:

# echo 'dynamic_tracepoint:mytracepoint <encode its format>' >> 
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/dynamic_trace_events
# perf list
   ...
   dynamic_tracepoint:mytracepoint
   ...

In perf side we can encode the creation of dynamic tracepoint into 
bpf-loader
like what we currectly do for probing the kprobes.

This way reqires us to create a fresh new event source, in parallel with 
tracepoint. I'm not sure
how much work it needs. What do you think?

Thank you.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf event Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-28 09:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf  event Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-08-29 02:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf  event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-29 03:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf  event Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-08-29 03:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf  event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-29 04:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf  event Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-08-29 04:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf  event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-29 04:40 +0200
              Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf  event Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> - 2015-08-29 05:00 +0200
                Re: [PATCH 32/32] bpf: Introduce function for outputing data to perf  event "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com> - 2015-08-29 05:00 +0200

csiph-web