Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1214494
| From | Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 09/10] kasan: Prevent deadlock in kasan reporting |
| Date | 2015-08-27 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q24ae-3Zi-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q1EfM-gF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1EfN-gF-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
2015-08-26 11:26 GMT+03:00 Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> We we end up calling kasan_report in real mode, our shadow mapping
> for even spinlock variable will show poisoned.
Generally I agree with this patch. We should disable reports when we
print report as early
as possible to prevent recursion in case of bug in spinlock or printk etc.
But I don't understand what is the problem that you observing.
How we ended up with shadow poisoned for a valid spinlock struct?
And since shadow poisoned for some valid memory we should get
enormous amount of false positive reports.
> This will result
> in us calling kasan_report_error with lock_report spin lock held.
> To prevent this disable kasan reporting when we are priting
> error w.r.t kasan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> mm/kasan/report.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/report.c b/mm/kasan/report.c
> index 79fbc5d14bd2..82b41eb83e43 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/report.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/report.c
> @@ -185,6 +185,10 @@ void kasan_report_error(struct kasan_access_info *info)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure we don't end up in loop.
> + */
> + kasan_disable_current();
> spin_lock_irqsave(&report_lock, flags);
> pr_err("================================="
> "=================================\n");
> @@ -194,12 +198,17 @@ void kasan_report_error(struct kasan_access_info *info)
> pr_err("================================="
> "=================================\n");
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&report_lock, flags);
> + kasan_enable_current();
> }
>
> void kasan_report_user_access(struct kasan_access_info *info)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> + /*
> + * Make sure we don't end up in loop.
> + */
> + kasan_disable_current();
> spin_lock_irqsave(&report_lock, flags);
> pr_err("================================="
> "=================================\n");
> @@ -212,6 +221,7 @@ void kasan_report_user_access(struct kasan_access_info *info)
> pr_err("================================="
> "=================================\n");
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&report_lock, flags);
> + kasan_enable_current();
> }
>
> void kasan_report(unsigned long addr, size_t size,
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH V2 09/10] kasan: Prevent deadlock in kasan reporting "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-08-26 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2 09/10] kasan: Prevent deadlock in kasan reporting Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> - 2015-08-27 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V2 09/10] kasan: Prevent deadlock in kasan reporting "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-08-30 15:00 +0200
csiph-web