Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1213429
| From | "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH] mm: Check if section present during memory block (un)registering |
| Date | 2015-08-26 01:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1vPc-4OX-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q1vct-3QR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1vvQ-4st-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> It appears this should be backported into -stable kernels, yes? Do you > know which kernel versions need the fix? For my setup the problem is first seen after: commit bdee237c0343 " x86: mm: Use 2GB memory block size on large memory x86-64 systems" which appeared in v3.19 and forced a 2GB memory block size. But it could happen on older systems depending on the block size picked based on the alignment of max_pfn. Looking further back (to v3.15) ... we used a fixed MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE for all systems prior to commit 982792c782ef "x86, mm: probe memory block size for generic x86 64bit" So maybe: Cc: stable@kernel.org #v3.15 -Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm: Check if section present during memory block (un)registering Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> - 2015-08-26 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: Check if section present during memory block (un)registering Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2015-08-26 01:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH] mm: Check if section present during memory block (un)registering "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2015-08-26 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: Check if section present during memory block (un)registering Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> - 2015-08-26 06:10 +0200
csiph-web