Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1212959
| From | Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled |
| Date | 2015-08-25 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1kh3-4Fj-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <q0YTg-7q8-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <q0ZcE-7Np-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <q0ZPk-kn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <q170u-2dD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1jO2-3RS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 08/25/2015 12:33 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:53:37PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 24.8.2015 15:16, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> return read_seqcount_retry(¤t->mems_allowed_seq, seq);
>>>>> @@ -139,7 +141,7 @@ static inline void set_mems_allowed(nodemask_t nodemask)
>>>>>
>>>>> #else /* !CONFIG_CPUSETS */
>>>>>
>>>>> -static inline bool cpusets_enabled(void) { return false; }
>>>>> +static inline bool cpusets_mems_enabled(void) { return false; }
>>>>>
>>>>> static inline int cpuset_init(void) { return 0; }
>>>>> static inline void cpuset_init_smp(void) {}
>>>>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>>>> index 62ae28d8ae8d..2c1c3bf54d15 100644
>>>>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>>>>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>>>>> @@ -2470,7 +2470,7 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
>>>>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && zlc_active &&
>>>>> !zlc_zone_worth_trying(zonelist, z, allowednodes))
>>>>> continue;
>>>>> - if (cpusets_enabled() &&
>>>>> + if (cpusets_mems_enabled() &&
>>>>> (alloc_flags & ALLOC_CPUSET) &&
>>>>> !cpuset_zone_allowed(zone, gfp_mask))
>>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>> Here the benefits are less clear. I guess cpuset_zone_allowed() is
>>>> potentially costly...
>>>>
>>>> Heck, shouldn't we just start the static key on -1 (if possible), so that
>>>> it's enabled only when there's 2+ cpusets?
>>
>> Hm wait a minute, that's what already happens:
>>
>> static inline int nr_cpusets(void)
>> {
>> /* jump label reference count + the top-level cpuset */
>> return static_key_count(&cpusets_enabled_key) + 1;
>> }
>>
>> I.e. if there's only the root cpuset, static key is disabled, so I think this
>> patch is moot after all?
>>
>
> static_key_count is an atomic read on a field in struct static_key where
> as static_key_false is a arch_static_branch which can be eliminated. The
> patch eliminates an atomic read so I didn't think it was moot.
Sorry I wasn't clear enough. My point is that AFAICS cpusets_enabled()
will only return true if there are more cpusets than the root
(top-level) one.
So the current cpusets_enabled() checks should be enough. Checking that
"nr_cpusets() > 1" only duplicates what is already covered by
cpusets_enabled() - see the nr_cpusets() listing above. I.e. David's
premise was wrong.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2015-08-24 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-08-24 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2015-08-24 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-08-24 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2015-08-25 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2015-08-25 13:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2015-08-26 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 04/12] mm, page_alloc: Only check cpusets when one exists that can be mem-controlled Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-08-26 12:50 +0200
csiph-web