Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1212625
| From | Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: parse_args() is too unforgivable? |
| Date | 2015-08-25 03:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1bns-d4-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pZYBY-2dA-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <q0jZM-7yI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <q120P-3p7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q14P0-7rq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> writes:
> On 08/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> I booted the kernel with the additional patch below, and nothing bad has
>> happened,
>
> Until I tried reboot it once with "locktorture.verbose=true" paramater.
> It didn't boot.
>
> This is because parse_args() just aborts after it hits the error, so other
> arguments at the same initcall level are simply ignored.
>
> Fixed by the patch below, but I simply can't believe nobody hit this (imo)
> bug before.
>
> Why does parse_args() do this?? I simply can't understand why parse_args()
> adds more random and hard-to-understand problems if one of the args ("=true"
> in this particular case) is wrong.
>
> Yes, the patch below is probably oversimplified / incomplete but imho the
> current behaviour is confusing. At least I was greatly confused ;) At least
> (I think) it makes sense to let the user know that the rest of command line
> was probably ignored.
This is nice, but please save and return the error properly; modules need
this too.
I think nobody hit this before because they notice that they screwed up
the commandline and it didn't boot.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 3/8] rcusync: Add the CONFIG_PROVE_RCU checks Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 6/8] percpu-rwsem: change it to rely on rss_sync infrastructure Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 5/8] percpu-rwsem: make percpu_free_rwsem() after kzalloc() safe Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 8/8] percpu-rwsem: cleanup the lockdep annotations in percpu_down_read() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 4/8] rcusync: Introduce rcu_sync_dtor() Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 7/8] percpu-rwsem: fix the comments outdated by rcu_sync Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 2/8] rcusync: Introduce struct rcu_sync_ops Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 1/8] rcu: Create rcu_sync infrastructure Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-08-22 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-24 17:40 +0200
parse_args() is too unforgivable? Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-24 20:40 +0200
Re: parse_args() is too unforgivable? Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2015-08-25 03:40 +0200
[PATCH 0/1] params: don't ignore the rest of cmdline if parse_one() fails Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-25 17:30 +0200
[PATCH 1/1] params: don't ignore the rest of cmdline if parse_one() fails Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-25 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] params: don't ignore the rest of cmdline if parse_one() fails Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> - 2015-08-26 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-08-26 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-26 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-08-26 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Add rcu_sync infrastructure to avoid _expedited() in percpu-rwsem "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-08-26 16:40 +0200
csiph-web