Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1214187
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used |
| Date | 2015-08-26 23:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1PXz-8w3-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pYzvY-1vo-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1Mn0-3z4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1NM6-5sE-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1PkS-7My-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Tony, On 08/26/2015 01:16 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: [ ... ] >> We may need two separate patches, one to fix up device_property_read_u32() >> to return -ENXIO, and one to fix smsc911x_probe_config() to ignore the error >> from device_get_phy_mode(), and to bail out if device_property_read_u32() >> returns -ENXIO. > > I guess the device_property_read_u32() change needs to be discussed > separately.. So probably best to fix up the regression to smsc911x > first. > Not sure myself. Jeremy has a point - we don't really know for sure how safe it is to check for -ENODATA (in addition to -ENXIO). Also, fixing device_property_read_u32() turned out to be much easier than I thought. >> The simpler alternative would be to check the return value from >> device_property_read_u32() for both -ENXIO and -ENODATA. >> This would make the code independent of the necessary core changes >> (which may take a while). I tested this variant, and it works, at least >> for the non-DT case. >> >> Does this make sense ? > > Yeh I think that would allow fixing up the smsc911x regression while > discussing the device_property_read_u32() change. Got a test patch > for me to try? > You should have two by now to choose from. Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2015-08-26 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> - 2015-08-26 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2015-08-26 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-08-26 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2015-08-26 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-08-26 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2015-08-26 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-08-26 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH -next] smsc911x: Fix crash seen if neither ACPI nor OF is configured or used Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2015-08-26 23:50 +0200
csiph-web