Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1214079
| From | Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT |
| Date | 2015-08-26 19:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1MZH-4is-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q1Ijo-602-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Marc nad Lorenzo, First of all appologies for breaking arm64 (again) and thank you for debugging effort. I own you. > - count is only incremented when max_entries != 0, as you noticed You are right, sorry for that, it's fixed in v3. > - With max_entries != 0, count now represent the sum of all matches > Is that expected? I have no strong opinion on that one. All of the x86 ACPI entries handling only checks for count < 0, or uses count from the acpi_subtable_proc structure (and that's why I didn't noticed the mainline breakage). If you think it's not correct or less usable than other approach, let me know. > - The proc iteration stops after the first match. Why? So, the initial implementation of the acpi_parse_entries accepted single handler for the ACPI table. Now, with this change, assumption is that different handlers for different tables/subtables are passed, meaning only one can meet entry->type == proc[i].id condition. mainline breakage). This approach saves one local varaible, but I don't think this is ultimate argument :) > - The test for max_entries is done inside the proc loop. Why? That's obviously wrong in context of the overall wrong counting. > [...] this should be documented and agreed upon. I've added description with assumptions. Again, if you think it's not correct, let me know. Tomasz Nowicki wrote: > should acpi_table_parse_entries suppose to be removed above? Thanks for pointing this out. I've missed implementation of acpi_table_parse_entries when was backporting initial patch. I've added it back. Cheers, Lukasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-08-26 09:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-08-26 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-08-26 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2015-08-26 14:50 +0200
[PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-08-26 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> - 2015-08-27 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-08-28 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> - 2015-09-01 10:10 +0200
RE: [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT "Anaczkowski, Lukasz" <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-09-01 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, arm64, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org> - 2015-09-01 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86, acpi: Handle lapic/x2apic entries in MADT Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com> - 2015-08-26 19:50 +0200
csiph-web