Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1213777
| From | Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' |
| Date | 2015-08-26 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q1HGH-5gu-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <q1fAJ-6pU-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1fAJ-6pU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1GhA-38h-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <q1Hx0-4PL-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:22:25 +0530 Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Thanks for your review comments. > > On 26/08/2015:06:31:03 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:34:19 +0530 > > Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> wrote: > > > TP_fast_assign( > > > __entry->xprt = xprt; > > > + __entry->addr = > > > + xprt ? (struct sockaddr *)&xprt->xpt_remote : NULL; > > > > I don't get it. It's not safe to save a pointer to xprt and dereference > > that in a tracepoint (and I understand why that is), but it is safe to > > save a pointer to a structure embedded inside of xprt? Shouldn't you be > > saving a copy of the entire sockaddr struct instead? > > As far as "saving of a pointer to a structure embedded inside of xprt" is > concerned, I do not see any issue. > > Its your take that what you want to print as your tracepoint print output. I > might be missing something.. However, I do not see any value addition in > printing address of a structure(located in ring buffer) where xprt->xpt_remote > has been copied. > > > > > Ahh, ok -- I think I see the confusion. %pIScp does not print the > > address of the sockaddr, but instead dereferences the pointer and > > prints it as a formatted address string. See pointer() in > > lib/vsprintf.c. You do want to save off a copy of the structure instead. > > In my opinion, saving of structure would only be necessary if you want to access > element of the structure xprt->xpt_remote. > > ~Pratyush That's exactly what %pI does. Look at the pointer() function. For this tracepoint, we want to print out the address of the remote end of the socket. That's saved in xprt->xpt_remote. %pIScp doesn't print the pointer's address. It dereferences that pointer and formats and prints the socket address that it points to. If you pass a NULL pointer into anything that uses %pI, it's going to oops. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> - 2015-08-25 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-08-25 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> - 2015-08-26 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> - 2015-08-26 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net> - 2015-08-26 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> - 2015-08-26 14:20 +0200
csiph-web