Re: [RFC 4/8] jbd, jbd2: Do not fail journal because of frozen_buffer allocation failure

From	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [RFC 4/8] jbd, jbd2: Do not fail journal because of frozen_buffer allocation failure
Date	2015-08-24 14:10 +0200
Message-ID	<q0YJA-7eS-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pU3Em-66q-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <pU3Em-66q-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pUa38-72o-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <pWAmx-8tE-71@gated-at.bofh.it> <pXKa5-3ff-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Ted,

On Sat 15-08-15 09:54:22, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 11:14:11AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > Is this "if (!committed_data) {" check now dead code?
> > > 
> > > I also see other similar suspected dead sites in the rest of the series.
> > 
> > You are absolutely right. I have updated the patches.
> 
> Have you sent out an updated version of these patches?  Maybe I missed
> it, but I don't think I saw them.

would you be interested in these two patches sent with rephrased
changelog to not depend on the patch which allows GFP_NOFS to fail? The
way this has been handled for btrfs...
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [RFC 4/8] jbd, jbd2: Do not fail journal because of  frozen_buffer allocation failure Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2015-08-24 14:10 +0200

csiph-web