Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1211327
| From | Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: is this a problem of numactl in RedHat7.0 ? |
| Date | 2015-08-21 23:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <q01zP-6sW-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pZQXO-86r-53@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 08/21/2015 05:27 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> I use numactl(--localalloc) tool run a test case, but it shows that
> the numa policy is prefer, I don't know why.
The kernel implements MPOL_PREFERRED and MPOL_LOCAL
in the same way. Look at this code in mpol_new(),
in mm/mempolicy.c:
/*
* MPOL_PREFERRED cannot be used with MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES or
* MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES if the nodemask is empty (local
allocation).
* All other modes require a valid pointer to a non-empty nodemask.
*/
if (mode == MPOL_PREFERRED) {
if (nodes_empty(*nodes)) {
if (((flags & MPOL_F_STATIC_NODES) ||
(flags & MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES)))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
} else if (mode == MPOL_LOCAL) {
if (!nodes_empty(*nodes))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
mode = MPOL_PREFERRED;
} else if (nodes_empty(*nodes))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
is this a problem of numactl in RedHat7.0 ? Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-08-21 11:40 +0200
Re: is this a problem of numactl in RedHat7.0 ? Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2015-08-21 23:00 +0200
Re: is this a problem of numactl in RedHat7.0 ? Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-08-24 05:40 +0200
Re: is this a problem of numactl in RedHat7.0 ? Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-08-24 06:30 +0200
csiph-web