Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1157387
| From | Gil Fruchter <gilf@ezchip.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply |
| Date | 2015-06-03 14:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pxfuW-8s4-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pwUJQ-2OE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pwUJQ-2OE-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pwVcS-3CW-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2015 16:26:28 +0300 > Gil Fruchter <gilf@ezchip.com> wrote: > >> fix checkpatch warning for using kzalloc with multiply: >> WARNING: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply >> + iter->buffer_iter = kzalloc(sizeof(*iter->buffer_iter) >> * num_possible_cpus(), > > I'm not against applying this patch, but "fix checkpatch warning" is never rational for a change. > > This should say something like, "Use kcalloc for allocating an array instead of a simple multiplier with kzalloc, as that is what kcalloc is used for." > > In other words, if checkpatch found something that should be change, have the change log tell us why it should be changed. You can than add a "Found with checkpatch" to give checkpatch the credit. > > -- Steve > Thanks for the input Steve. I will create a v2 with an appropriate explanation for this change. Can I add a Reviewed-by tag by you? Gil -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: [PATCH 1/2] tracing: Prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply Gil Fruchter <gilf@ezchip.com> - 2015-06-03 14:00 +0200
csiph-web