Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1157332

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/tools: put new buildid locks to use

Path csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/tools: put new buildid locks to use
Date Wed, 03 Jun 2015 13:30:02 +0200
Message-ID <pxf1U-7Sy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ppVKF-1aa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ppVKF-1aa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ppYSe-5EF-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <ppZEB-6PR-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <pq5gZ-6Jq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pxeSe-7GO-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com>
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=BRhk/U6bCbkkIduzK1D042KFcBXWyo0DCJDRI57iza8=; b=DoSwnUXiHWE9VgyKmSue9hhO/HdJmNQ5dR0HFuae4vx/7zyTjc+9FAYiVnG8Tm/jqW 2aOZlUgNDs3j8EJ/baPqsPfUHYSU++Led7kT/+AJS7AEDK3SZhgSE39oae3IQ2QZGw31 LOUr/rG0QsX7haR+p+C/b2A7f+YfzgR+QmxCmzSGCMx+4FIh84hT1vGMyI6k98pIA0hv Hp1TcE41gyKFKZM+n8k+RepheE8EOn7qtK+jp+wCLH2QPQS4j+Si+DwgqscX5fYfqUwV DqEpCFexvhZ6oQFYQpibYv16YIRz34lNXm8/x9kInHX3xOZHd5THER9jOVMFuwaLqvnq mLqw==
X-Received by 10.194.84.100 with SMTP id x4mr61819774wjy.69.1433330505607; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 04:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition inline
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 91
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>, "open list:PERFORMANCE EVENT..." <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
X-Original-Date Wed, 3 Jun 2015 13:21:41 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID <20150603112141.GA25670@gmail.com>
X-Original-References <1431588493-1474-1-git-send-email-milos@redhat.com> <1431588493-1474-3-git-send-email-milos@redhat.com> <20150514104059.GA27771@gmail.com> <20150514113821.GB1313@krava.redhat.com> <20150514173807.GA19338@gmail.com> <20150603111310.GA3217@lenivo.usersys.redhat.com>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref aioe.org linux.kernel:1157332

Show key headers only | View raw


* Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 07:38:08PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 01:38:21PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > * Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Use new read/write locks when accesing buildid directory on places where
> > > > > > we may race if multiple instances are run simultaneously.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Dunno, this will create locking interaction between multiple instances 
> > > > > of perf - hanging each other, etc.
> > > > > 
> > > > > And it seems unnecessary: the buildid hierarchy is already spread out. 
> > > > > What kind of races might there be?
> > > > 
> > > > there was just recently one fixed by commit:
> > > >   0635b0f71424 perf tools: Fix race in build_id_cache__add_s()
> > > > 
> > > > havent checked the final patch yet, but the idea is to
> > > > protect us from similar bugs
> > > 
> > > right. on top of race with EEXIST couple more are possible (EMLINK, 
> > > ENOSPC, EDQUOT, ENOMEM... the only way to prevent them all is to 
> > > lock this kind of operations and make sure we run one at a time.
> > 
> > Yeah, so the race pointed out in 0635b0f71424 can be (and should be) 
> > fixed without locking:
> > 
> >  - first create the file under a process-private name under 
> >    ~/.debug/tmp/ if the target does not exist yet
> > 
> >  - then fully fill it in with content
> > 
> >  - then link(2) it to the public target name, which VFS operation is
> >    atomic and may fail safely: at which point it got already created
> >    by someone else.
> > 
> >  - finally unlink() the private instance name and the target will now
> >    be the only instance left: either created by us, or by some other 
> >    perf instance in the rare racy case.
> > 
> > Since all of ~/.debug is on the same filesystem this should work fine.
> > 
> > Beyond avoiding locking this approach has another advantage: it's 
> > transaction safe, so a crashed/interrupted perf instance won't corrupt 
> > the debug database, it will only put fully constructed files into the 
> > public build-id namespace. It at most leaves a stale private file 
> > around in ~/.debug/tmp/.
> > 
> 
> Ingo,
> 
> I finally found some time to make this change. While going over the code I've 
> noticed one thing that would make concurrent creation even easier to solve. 
> Instead of copying the file to temp file what about simply opening file with 
> O_CREAT|O_EXCL? creat itself
> 
> "creat() is equivalent to open() with flags equal to O_CREAT|O_WRONLY|O_TRUNC."
> 
> addition of O_EXCL would
> 
> "Ensure that this call creates the file: if this flag is specified in 
> conjunction with O_CREAT, and pathname already exists, then open() will fail."
> 
> This we would prevent truncation of already linked file in case link() races as 
> in 0635b0f71424. What do you think?

But it would not prevent the problem of creating a not yet fully constructed file 
- which some other tool invocation could attempt to parse in an incomplete 
fashion.

Using create+link+unlink avoids that race, the files in the publicly visible 
namespace will always be fully constructed by the time they are made visible 
(atomically).

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/tools: put new buildid locks to use Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com> - 2015-06-03 13:20 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/tools: put new buildid locks to use Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2015-06-03 13:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/tools: put new buildid locks to use Milos Vyletel <milos@redhat.com> - 2015-06-03 13:30 +0200

csiph-web