Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1210482
| From | Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver |
| Date | 2015-08-20 14:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <pZxs7-57Q-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <pSk6B-Yx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <pU1sR-32s-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pVPdU-6C4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <pZs94-65q-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 09:05:07AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 08:53:34AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > Hi Sascha, > > > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:31:17AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:08:07PM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Following our discussion, I send an RFC version of my driver. RFC because it is > > > > not totally achieved, some cleanup and feature addition is needed. > > > > > > > > At least, we could discuss about the 'core' part. I have used the pinmux > > > > property as Mediatek driver. Patch 3 is the internal dt files we are using. > > > > > > As you can imagine I am fine with the binding, so I can add my acked-by > > > once you send a non-RFC version. > > > > > > > Great, I'm glad to hear that. > > > > > The only thing I never understood is what's so special about GPIOs that > > > they have to bypass the pinctrl framework and instead a gpio_request > > > magically translates a gpio into a pin. > > > > Not sure to really understand your concern here... Do you mean I could > > get rid of gpio_request_enable()? > > I would expect a gpio to be a pin like every other pin, hence configured > via the pinctrl framework and not implicitly via gpio_request(). > It is not an issue to get rid of gpio_request_*(). I was thinking it was a bonus to provide it. > > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to at > > > least add the pins in their GPIO mode to > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2-pinfunc.h? > > > > It is done, PIN_PA0 could be used for this purpose. > > I would expect a define like: > > #define PIN_PA3__GPIO PINMUX_PIN(PIN_PA3, 0, 2) > > PIN_PAx only contains the pin number, but not the function. Ok I can do this change for v2. Ludovic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-08-05 09:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-08-10 09:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> - 2015-08-20 09:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] New Atmel PIO4 pinctrl/gpio driver Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> - 2015-08-20 14:50 +0200
csiph-web